Yeh right cocktail

Gap

Mango

Mango

I was doing a shopping

for some project.

Some of those items are so basic and simple that you can so easily miss out; in fact, use them right, you'll get your right looks; similarly, different pieces from different places, one can have her right cocktail, provided that most of the things are correctly chosen and handled.

Well, I don't think that the project is going to roll as planned, but since they're already out there, why don't you use them?
Here are some of the stuffs.

Acne

Preen

Burberry

Céline

Nina Ricci

Céline

Céline

Zara

Doo Ri

Publier le message

Erdem

Current/Elliott

Jason Wu

Jean-Michel Basquiat and Kate Lanphear

Ran into an extract about Basquiat on Arte. It seems that he's been talked about quite a bit lately. The other day there's just an opening or something like that for an exhibition or a film about him. Heard or read about people saying how talented he was and so on. Somehow I still think that as long as one is not a gigantuous banal entity, with that amount of drugs and stuffs, one can always more or less come up with some stuffs that could be interpreted as art work.
Of course, once again, it depends on how you see the stuffs and for what reason you talk about it.
Actually, it occurs to me that there weren't many brilliant artists, so-called artists, writers, so-called fashion designers, philosophers, musicians, so-called this and that, who were sober, or clean in that sense.

Performance and good luck.



A situation a little similar is that about Kate Lanphear.
Let's say that one can of course dress hi/herself with such sharp style as long as one got such wardrobe which provides an incredible abundant choices......  However, the reason why I say it's only "a little similar" is that most of the time, if you observe clearly, an uniform suits most of people.
Simple, they don't know how to dress themselves.

Kate knows what and how, do you?

Wired

Well, that's maybe the difference.........
the disposability??

the community

just caught up the first two episodes of the community season 2.
hilarious

there're two more left.
so wanna go on.
but it would wind up having nothing done again.

a classic non-achiever situation.




maybe doing sth. is better than doing nothing.

Sunday trance

Supposed to be last Sunday afternoon-

Warmer than today-

Sun lights twinkled outside-

Thought something was out there-

Did I capture it?

What about Martin Margiela

About Martin Margiela

Still, I don't get why Sarah Mower and Nicole Phelps got so many negative opinons about MMM's recent women collections. Mostly due to the so-called absence of Margiela in the house. Well, what else beside that? From an amateur's point of view, I can't really tell those differences and the lack of this and that. Indeed I should spend more time on "studying" collections and make some more efforts on "codes reading" but to be honestly, seldom was I into Margiela's show pieces, and I still don't now. From this angle, it's still pretty much coherent, those collections, at least to me.
Of course some of them are better than the others, but that isn't what those critics and journalists are talking about; all they point to is the absence of the person. And that comes along with fashionistas and who-knows-what-wannabes' original opinions/criticisms. Fairly bugging.

The point is that you cannot tell. He's there. He's not there. Who's ever being there? The fun thing is that it's so manipulative. And once again the power of media as well as the enthusiasm of parrots.


Wouldn't it be so simple that it's how they want you to see and to think in a certain way?
By they I mean MMM or the person behind or the person behind the person behind.
Ain't that funny. Drop an ink into a glass of water and see how it becomes. Somehow it coincides with the idea in Le Placard I watched earlier this evening. A hilarious story by the way.

                                                  
So, the whereabouts of Margiela.
It reminds me of collections he made while he's in Hermès when I see Céline's collections lately, especially when it comes to those leather-made garments. Who's doing what? Who's where?
Phoebe is adorable, so is her style.

By the way, MMM's last collection 2010aw isn't that good; I don't have the faintest idea what Sarah were praising about and what Nicole are bitching about the latest one comparing to which.

I might be the dumbest one that care about them after all.

What about Martin Margiela again?

                                                    

PATHS CROSSED//

This one entitled paths crossed from Jak and Jil.
Lovely.

Night time

"Night time" by the xx


Still, it's reminiscent of that event at the end of last August.

Miss NC, are you all gone?

Anna Dello Russo by Garance Doré

Well, it's not so eccentric to me.
Does it really seem to be eccentric to the most of people out there? Not really, not really.
It's kinda nice. Is it exaggerating? Not for people there.
The picture is from Garance Doré.

At times you just fail to see the nice side of people, instead you see right through them. Which might

not be the courtesy at the time being.

Anyway, the picture is good, the words are good; as to the figure and the connotation, why care?

when it's gone, it's done

When it's gone, it's done.
Sometimes it's just like that.

You can't break it,
you can't fix it,
you can do nothing about it.

You can only look at it,
or look away.

It's gone, it's done.